A New Simple Test for Green
Back in July, I blogged about a simple test that environmentally conscious consumers could use to separate the truly green companies from those that merely use green as a marketing ploy or green washing. I’m proud to say that Clean Currents has recently taken a step to draw an even brighter line between our actions and sustainability commitment as a company vs. those in our industry who merely talk a good green game.
Clean Currents achieved certification as a “B Corp.”
This is a huge step. B Corp certification, run by the non profit group, B Lab, is one of the most stringent sustainability certification models in the nation. We are the first company in Montgomery County, and the fourth in the entire state of Maryland to achieve this advanced certification.
Being a certified B Corp means we are subject to a third party audit to verify the sustainability of our business practice. The B Corp web site best describes what this certification means:
Certified B Corporations are a new type of corporation which uses the power of business to solve social and environmental problems. B Corps are unlike traditional businesses because they:
• Meet comprehensive and transparent social and environmental performance standards;
• Meet higher legal accountability standards;
• Build business constituency for good business
There are currently no other energy companies in Maryland, DC, Pennsylvania or Delaware that are certified as a B Corporation. Clean Currents is the only one. We are proud of that and will continue to work to live up to the expectations that come with this designation. Check out more about B Corp HERE.
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Competitive Markets and Wind Power are a Great Match
The American Wind Energy Association recently put out a statement supporting competitive wholesale electricity markets. It’s great to see the nation’s premier wind industry association take a positive stand on the kind of market structure we have here in the Mid Atlantic (with the exception of Virginia). Clean Currents supports the rapid deployment of wind energy in our region and the continuation (and growth) of competitive energy markets. Consumers and the environment both benefit from our open markets.
According to a joint AWEA/Compete statement, nearly 80% of U.S. installed wind capacity is located in regions with competitive energy markets, yet these areas only have 44% of U.S. wind energy potential. A competitive energy market is a market where consumers have the ability to choose their electricity supplier. The utilities don’t control the entire chain of production of electricity, from generation through distribution. The opposite, a monopoly market, is where the incumbent utility controls everything and consumers (and generators) have no choice but to go with them. In Maryland, DC, Delaware, and Pennsylvania we are fortunate to have an open, competitive market.
It’s not surprising that a competitive market is better for wind energy development. The incumbent utilities, if they are in a monopoly with no competition, are not the best vehicles to help development alternative energy. They don’t know how to sell or market it, and they are in no rush to invest in it. In short, they are not innovators.
Companies like Clean Currents are constantly thinking of new ways to expand the clean energy market. Given the right market structure, with proper government incentives, we can develop even more wind power in this region. We are excited to be working with Governor O’Malley and other leaders to craft proposals that will bring offshore wind closer to reality. That’s part of our business model – building demand for green power and working on positive environmental legislation. We are going to push a model that will promote more wind power while building on the success of the competitive energy market. The two go hand in hand.
The American Wind Energy Association recently put out a statement supporting competitive wholesale electricity markets. It’s great to see the nation’s premier wind industry association take a positive stand on the kind of market structure we have here in the Mid Atlantic (with the exception of Virginia). Clean Currents supports the rapid deployment of wind energy in our region and the continuation (and growth) of competitive energy markets. Consumers and the environment both benefit from our open markets.
According to a joint AWEA/Compete statement, nearly 80% of U.S. installed wind capacity is located in regions with competitive energy markets, yet these areas only have 44% of U.S. wind energy potential. A competitive energy market is a market where consumers have the ability to choose their electricity supplier. The utilities don’t control the entire chain of production of electricity, from generation through distribution. The opposite, a monopoly market, is where the incumbent utility controls everything and consumers (and generators) have no choice but to go with them. In Maryland, DC, Delaware, and Pennsylvania we are fortunate to have an open, competitive market.
It’s not surprising that a competitive market is better for wind energy development. The incumbent utilities, if they are in a monopoly with no competition, are not the best vehicles to help development alternative energy. They don’t know how to sell or market it, and they are in no rush to invest in it. In short, they are not innovators.
Companies like Clean Currents are constantly thinking of new ways to expand the clean energy market. Given the right market structure, with proper government incentives, we can develop even more wind power in this region. We are excited to be working with Governor O’Malley and other leaders to craft proposals that will bring offshore wind closer to reality. That’s part of our business model – building demand for green power and working on positive environmental legislation. We are going to push a model that will promote more wind power while building on the success of the competitive energy market. The two go hand in hand.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Building Demand for Green from the Ground Up
Clean Currents just wrapped up our first Green Neighborhood Challenge (GNEC) and we’re launching right into GNEC 2 without missing a beat! Our experience and the response we got in GNEC 1 has taught us that we have tapped into something powerful in the public consciousness. People are looking for connections, commitment and financial help for their communities. Clean Currents is looking to build demand for green energy solutions from the ground up. Enter GNEC, which steps into the void left by antiseptic corporate marketing, social disconnect, lack of resources, and lack of meaningful national government action on the biggest environmental challenge of our generation – global climate change. Marketing from the ground up, meeting people where they are rather than where you (the company) are, is the essence of GNEC.
Connections
The premise of GNEC is that Clean Currents provides an organizing tool (wind power for homes and solar), which allows people of various communities to connect with each other, build stronger community bonds, and strengthen community spirit. By “community,” we mean any grouping of people who share a commonality. This could be a neighborhood, a town, a faith institution, a non profit group, a school, a union, a bridge club. In simple terms, we give community leaders something to talk about. In an ideal GNEC situation, there would be multiple social events (especially parties!), outward signs of participations in the community (lawn signs, etc.) and participation by a strong, core group of volunteers. This includes online social media.
Commitment
For GNEC 2 to succeed, we need to build beyond the focus of GNEC 1. We need to continue to push the message about people switching to wind or solar power for their homes. But we also need to translate into actions our words about Clean Currents being “a front door to a sustainable lifestyle.” This means that wind power for homes or solar installation is merely the hook to get people talking about a larger conversation. That larger conversation is centered on the need to reduce our environmental impact, improve the laws in our states and this nation, and changing some of our habits as consumers. Clean Currents is committed to helping pass positive environmental legislation that puts a price on carbon emissions and mandates reductions in greenhouse gases. If you sign up your community for GNEC 2, we are committed to bringing our partners and allies to your community, to help educate people about reducing their environmental impact. This includes recycling, composting, energy efficiency, car sharing, and a host of other ways to lead a more sustainable life. Finally, Clean Currents wants to help consumers learn about the many companies out there that offer green products, and more importantly, that operate as sustainable companies. It’s vital that consumers vote with their wallets by supporting businesses that are doing the right thing.
Financial Help
The financial component of GNEC should not be under valued. Clean Currents is providing real dollars to communities to help them pursue green projects or to support green advocacy/education groups. In GNEC 1, we will be donating more than $15,000 in total. For GNEC 2, we want to double that. Individual consumers should also see financial incentives for participation. Thus, Clean Currents offers reduced prices on solar installations for customers that are already wind powered. It’s kind of like a co-op, where communities band together to achieve better pricing for individual members of the community.
Conclusion
We at Clean Currents are only just scratching the surface on community level marketing right now, but already I can tell there is something powerful there. We are not perfect, and are learning from our mistakes along the way. However, by working with community leaders and getting real feedback from people we can build a powerful community of people, businesses, and other groups working to create demand for clean energy from the ground up.
Clean Currents just wrapped up our first Green Neighborhood Challenge (GNEC) and we’re launching right into GNEC 2 without missing a beat! Our experience and the response we got in GNEC 1 has taught us that we have tapped into something powerful in the public consciousness. People are looking for connections, commitment and financial help for their communities. Clean Currents is looking to build demand for green energy solutions from the ground up. Enter GNEC, which steps into the void left by antiseptic corporate marketing, social disconnect, lack of resources, and lack of meaningful national government action on the biggest environmental challenge of our generation – global climate change. Marketing from the ground up, meeting people where they are rather than where you (the company) are, is the essence of GNEC.
Connections
The premise of GNEC is that Clean Currents provides an organizing tool (wind power for homes and solar), which allows people of various communities to connect with each other, build stronger community bonds, and strengthen community spirit. By “community,” we mean any grouping of people who share a commonality. This could be a neighborhood, a town, a faith institution, a non profit group, a school, a union, a bridge club. In simple terms, we give community leaders something to talk about. In an ideal GNEC situation, there would be multiple social events (especially parties!), outward signs of participations in the community (lawn signs, etc.) and participation by a strong, core group of volunteers. This includes online social media.
Commitment
For GNEC 2 to succeed, we need to build beyond the focus of GNEC 1. We need to continue to push the message about people switching to wind or solar power for their homes. But we also need to translate into actions our words about Clean Currents being “a front door to a sustainable lifestyle.” This means that wind power for homes or solar installation is merely the hook to get people talking about a larger conversation. That larger conversation is centered on the need to reduce our environmental impact, improve the laws in our states and this nation, and changing some of our habits as consumers. Clean Currents is committed to helping pass positive environmental legislation that puts a price on carbon emissions and mandates reductions in greenhouse gases. If you sign up your community for GNEC 2, we are committed to bringing our partners and allies to your community, to help educate people about reducing their environmental impact. This includes recycling, composting, energy efficiency, car sharing, and a host of other ways to lead a more sustainable life. Finally, Clean Currents wants to help consumers learn about the many companies out there that offer green products, and more importantly, that operate as sustainable companies. It’s vital that consumers vote with their wallets by supporting businesses that are doing the right thing.
Financial Help
The financial component of GNEC should not be under valued. Clean Currents is providing real dollars to communities to help them pursue green projects or to support green advocacy/education groups. In GNEC 1, we will be donating more than $15,000 in total. For GNEC 2, we want to double that. Individual consumers should also see financial incentives for participation. Thus, Clean Currents offers reduced prices on solar installations for customers that are already wind powered. It’s kind of like a co-op, where communities band together to achieve better pricing for individual members of the community.
Conclusion
We at Clean Currents are only just scratching the surface on community level marketing right now, but already I can tell there is something powerful there. We are not perfect, and are learning from our mistakes along the way. However, by working with community leaders and getting real feedback from people we can build a powerful community of people, businesses, and other groups working to create demand for clean energy from the ground up.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Where’s the Energy in the Elections?
The recent primary elections in Maryland set a record for low voter turnout in some parts of the state. There’s a total lack of energy among voters. I hope that between now and November 2nd, things change for the better. Voter turnout will be the deciding factor in many races across the region. If the pro environment voters stays home, we may have a major post-election hangover on November 3rd. Good clean energy laws that make a real difference are not necessarily permanent. They are always at risk of being reversed.
So, how do we get the energy back in the election? First, we have to do our civic duty and become educated, informed voters. That means checking out what groups like the Maryland League of Conservation Voters have to say about candidates. They are non partisan and focus solely on environmental issues. If you see or talk to a candidate, ask him/her about clean energy and the environment. Donate money, if you can, to pro clean energy candidates. Once you’ve energized and educated yourself, get the word out to your friends and neighbors. Use Facebook. Use the phone. Volunteer to go door to door for your local candidate.
It’s so easy to fall into the cynical view that “all the bums are the same.” Yes, our system needs major reform to have our elected representatives better reflect the views of their constituents and not of the groups that fund their campaigns. But elections do matter when it comes to clean energy policy. We’ve made huge strides in Maryland and DC on clean energy and environmental legislation. Pennsylvania’s outgoing Governor has a record that matches the best of any other leader. But these gains can be easily reversed. To get to a cleaner, greener future, we need human energy from voters this November. Staying home is not an option.
So, how do we get the energy back in the election? First, we have to do our civic duty and become educated, informed voters. That means checking out what groups like the Maryland League of Conservation Voters have to say about candidates. They are non partisan and focus solely on environmental issues. If you see or talk to a candidate, ask him/her about clean energy and the environment. Donate money, if you can, to pro clean energy candidates. Once you’ve energized and educated yourself, get the word out to your friends and neighbors. Use Facebook. Use the phone. Volunteer to go door to door for your local candidate.
It’s so easy to fall into the cynical view that “all the bums are the same.” Yes, our system needs major reform to have our elected representatives better reflect the views of their constituents and not of the groups that fund their campaigns. But elections do matter when it comes to clean energy policy. We’ve made huge strides in Maryland and DC on clean energy and environmental legislation. Pennsylvania’s outgoing Governor has a record that matches the best of any other leader. But these gains can be easily reversed. To get to a cleaner, greener future, we need human energy from voters this November. Staying home is not an option.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Go (Green) Back to School
There’s a lot riding on the shoulders of the students in Maryland, DC, Delaware, Pennsylvania and the rest of the nation who are beginning a new school year. Sure, they have the usual academic and social challenges that have beguiled students over the years. But they have an added challenge – figuring out a way to get this nation to seriously fight global climate change. Their elders have failed them. The Congress has let yet another year go by without passing any kind of cap on carbon and the other greenhouse gases that cause climate change. The general public doesn’t seem to have any burning desire to actually solve the problem. It will likely take a new generation making a push to actually get anything done at the national level. That’s where the students come in.
Recycled paper and eco friendly school supplies only get you so far. The next step for students is to join their school’s green club. If the school doesn’t have one yet, form one. Every high school in the Mid Atlantic should have a green club. The green club should push students, teachers, and the school administration to adopt practices that reduce their carbon footprints, whether it’s switching to wind power, installing solar, getting more energy efficient, or other measures. That’s step one. Step two is to bring climate education into the curriculum. Green clubs can work with the Alliance for Climate Education (ACE) or other groups to do this. Step three is to have the green club act as a driving force to push for local or national legislation to cap and cut greenhouse gases. Students may be too young to vote, but they bring something that candidates for office need almost as much – energy, time, and a megaphone. Organized campaigns by green clubs can have an impact on how local politicians vote. I’m sure of it. Finally, step three is to unite forces. High school green clubs should work together to promote a common message and share resources. It’s far more effective that way.
Clean Currents will be doing our part to help these efforts. Our Green Neighborhood Challenge Two will have a special school division, so we can focus our efforts on supporting the work of green clubs. We are also going to partner with ACE to bring more serious climate education into the schools. We also want to act as a facilatator for green clubs working together, making sure best practices and messages are shared.
Young people have made a lot of changes in our history, it's time for them to step up again.
If you are, or you know a student going to High School this year, let us know how we can help. Simply email gogreen@cleancurrents.com.
Recycled paper and eco friendly school supplies only get you so far. The next step for students is to join their school’s green club. If the school doesn’t have one yet, form one. Every high school in the Mid Atlantic should have a green club. The green club should push students, teachers, and the school administration to adopt practices that reduce their carbon footprints, whether it’s switching to wind power, installing solar, getting more energy efficient, or other measures. That’s step one. Step two is to bring climate education into the curriculum. Green clubs can work with the Alliance for Climate Education (ACE) or other groups to do this. Step three is to have the green club act as a driving force to push for local or national legislation to cap and cut greenhouse gases. Students may be too young to vote, but they bring something that candidates for office need almost as much – energy, time, and a megaphone. Organized campaigns by green clubs can have an impact on how local politicians vote. I’m sure of it. Finally, step three is to unite forces. High school green clubs should work together to promote a common message and share resources. It’s far more effective that way.
Clean Currents will be doing our part to help these efforts. Our Green Neighborhood Challenge Two will have a special school division, so we can focus our efforts on supporting the work of green clubs. We are also going to partner with ACE to bring more serious climate education into the schools. We also want to act as a facilatator for green clubs working together, making sure best practices and messages are shared.
Young people have made a lot of changes in our history, it's time for them to step up again.
If you are, or you know a student going to High School this year, let us know how we can help. Simply email gogreen@cleancurrents.com.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
A Simple Test for Green
Consumers who care about the environment are a prime target of green washing, fake "green" companies. This is no surprise. Environmentally conscious consumers are generally well educated and well off. They are a great target market and thus tempting to companies that might otherwise have no green interest (environmental "green," that is).
You have to do a little additional homework to separate the truly green companies from the green washers. I propose this simple three part test to figure out who talks "green" and who actually walks "green:"
1. Does the company only offer green products or is a green product part of a group of products, including polluting products?
Are they promoting "wind power" on the one hand, while selling massive amounts of coal or nuclear power on the other hand?
2. Are the company's operations certified as being sustainable by a legitimate third party entity, which performs an actual on-site audit?
For example, when Clean Currents got certified by Montgomery County Maryland's Department of Environmental Protection, we had auditors visit our office to ensure we are doing everything we claimed we were. Any kind of "green registry" that does not require a third party audit is worthless.
3. Does the company work with advocacy groups to support environmental legislation beyond legislation that would directly improve the company's business?
A solar company that advocates for increased solar incentives does not count. That's pure self interest. But companies like Clean Currents that push for broad legislation that reduces carbon emissions, or that cleans up the Bay make a real difference beyond their immediate self interest.
So, if a company claims they are sustainable on their web site, ask them for proof. If they say they donate money to non profits, or support planting trees or something like that, tell them that's not enough. Even Exxon Mobil donates to charities like that. The true test is what are they doing to change the laws of this nation (or of their home states or cities)? Voluntary green actions are great, and they are important in terms of making a difference. Environmental consumers have the power to change the way business is done, to ensure that every company becomes a true green minded entity instead of a green washer trying to make a quick buck on the latest fad. By purchasing products only from green companies that pass the simple green test, you are ensuring that there will be a growing industry of truly green businesses that protect the planet while protecting their bottom line.
You have to do a little additional homework to separate the truly green companies from the green washers. I propose this simple three part test to figure out who talks "green" and who actually walks "green:"
1. Does the company only offer green products or is a green product part of a group of products, including polluting products?
Are they promoting "wind power" on the one hand, while selling massive amounts of coal or nuclear power on the other hand?
2. Are the company's operations certified as being sustainable by a legitimate third party entity, which performs an actual on-site audit?
For example, when Clean Currents got certified by Montgomery County Maryland's Department of Environmental Protection, we had auditors visit our office to ensure we are doing everything we claimed we were. Any kind of "green registry" that does not require a third party audit is worthless.
3. Does the company work with advocacy groups to support environmental legislation beyond legislation that would directly improve the company's business?
A solar company that advocates for increased solar incentives does not count. That's pure self interest. But companies like Clean Currents that push for broad legislation that reduces carbon emissions, or that cleans up the Bay make a real difference beyond their immediate self interest.
So, if a company claims they are sustainable on their web site, ask them for proof. If they say they donate money to non profits, or support planting trees or something like that, tell them that's not enough. Even Exxon Mobil donates to charities like that. The true test is what are they doing to change the laws of this nation (or of their home states or cities)? Voluntary green actions are great, and they are important in terms of making a difference. Environmental consumers have the power to change the way business is done, to ensure that every company becomes a true green minded entity instead of a green washer trying to make a quick buck on the latest fad. By purchasing products only from green companies that pass the simple green test, you are ensuring that there will be a growing industry of truly green businesses that protect the planet while protecting their bottom line.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Pennsylvania’s Future Could Be Sunny - Act Now
The Pennsylvania legislature is considering a bill (HB 2405) that would dramatically increase the amount of solar in the state, plus provide new demand for clean, renewable wind power. If passed, this legislation will once again cement the Keystone state as a national clean energy leader. Clean Currents is proud to be supporting this vital bill.
The bill would increase the percentage of energy that must be produced by solar energy in the state six-fold, creating enough solar energy to power more than 400,000 homes. It would practically double the amount of energy coming from wind power or clean biomass. It would also provide additional consumer protections and extend the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS) out until 2024.
Importantly, this is a bi-partisan effort. Clean energy should not be held hostage to politics, and it’s good to see that in Pennsylvania there is support from both sides of the aisle.
The fate of the bill is uncertain, however. So, if you live in Pennsylvania, please take action immediately!
Click here to go to Penn Future’s web page and contact your legislator. Ask them to support HB 2405, for a cleaner, greener future in Pennsylvania.
Clean Currents is proud to be offering wind power for homes and businesses now in Pennsylvania. We would be even more interested in opening an office for solar energy installation if this bill passes.
The bill would increase the percentage of energy that must be produced by solar energy in the state six-fold, creating enough solar energy to power more than 400,000 homes. It would practically double the amount of energy coming from wind power or clean biomass. It would also provide additional consumer protections and extend the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standard (AEPS) out until 2024.
Importantly, this is a bi-partisan effort. Clean energy should not be held hostage to politics, and it’s good to see that in Pennsylvania there is support from both sides of the aisle.
The fate of the bill is uncertain, however. So, if you live in Pennsylvania, please take action immediately!
Click here to go to Penn Future’s web page and contact your legislator. Ask them to support HB 2405, for a cleaner, greener future in Pennsylvania.
Clean Currents is proud to be offering wind power for homes and businesses now in Pennsylvania. We would be even more interested in opening an office for solar energy installation if this bill passes.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Victory on Carbon in Montgomery County
Victory in Montgomery County
Just as I was starting to sour on the elected leadership of Montgomery County, Maryland, they once again show that when it comes to progressive environmental laws, there's no place like it in the nation. Under the leadership of Roger Berliner, the County Council adopted the first (I believe) carbon tax in the U.S. The tax effects the one large carbon polluter in the county, the Dickerson coal fired power plant owned by Mirant. It is a modest tax, only expected to raise $7.5 to $15 million a year from Mirant. However, in this age of deficits and government spending cuts, this is a welcome piece of new revenue for the county to use to support clean energy and energy efficiency programs.
Though this is progressive Montgomery County, the vote on this bill was not easy. I was proud to come out in support of the bill and to lobby for it, but unfortunately, on the day of the hearings, Americans for Prosperity, a group funded by one of the biggest oil barons in the nation, as well as Exxon and others, showed up. And let me put this simply - they were not in a mood to discuss the pros and cons of the bill. They came to disrupt, to shout, and to scare our elected leaders into submission. I had come to politely give my support for the Carbon Tax bill and was shocked to find myself in the midst of a tea party mob of 100 people or so. The good guys only numbered a handful, among them Keith and the CCAN crew, Amanda from Clean Currents, and Fred Teal, super star Green Neighborhood leader for Clean Currents.
I almost lost my temper when they started cat-calling and disrupting the testimony of my good friend and climate hero, Mike Tidwell, Director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. Luckily, Mike kept his cool as he explained how Mirant has repeatedly violated environmental rules, fights new environmental legislation, and is contributing significantly to climate change. I was never more proud.
Then, Council Members George Leventhal and Roger Berliner spoke, and they demonstrated the exact right way to handle these flat-earther tea party types. They didn't back down, apologize, or go quietly behind closed doors to express their views. Instead, they took the Mirant company official who testified out to the proverbial woodshed. They got Mirant to admit that climate change is real, is caused by man, and must be addressed (unlike the Mirant supporters and various morons in the audience who were shouting that climate change is a hoax). They got Mirant to admit that the energy that the coal plant produces doesn't even serve Montgomery County (we just get the pollution). Finally, Roger Berliner asked how Mirant could afford to pump $500 million into upgrades at the plant (forced to do so against their will, by the passage of the Healthy Air Act), but would shut down over a $7.5 to $15 million tax. The Mirant guy said that if the tax were added to the costs of the plant's operations, the plant would not be profitable (are you listening Wall Street?). Either he is stretching the truth or this is the most unprofitable coal plant in the history of the world. Most coal plants like this are gold mines for their owners.
If this Carbon Tax stands, it will serve as a model for other towns, cities, counties and places to fight climate change, promote clean energy, and bring in new revenue. Of course, a Federal effort would be better, but if we can't get a bill done with 59 or 60 Democrats in control of the Senate, we'll never get one. We need to do this from the ground up.
My hope is that the County will now fund its award winning Clean Energy Rewards program again, plus other worthy clean energy/energy efficiency programs. Way to go MoCo!
Just as I was starting to sour on the elected leadership of Montgomery County, Maryland, they once again show that when it comes to progressive environmental laws, there's no place like it in the nation. Under the leadership of Roger Berliner, the County Council adopted the first (I believe) carbon tax in the U.S. The tax effects the one large carbon polluter in the county, the Dickerson coal fired power plant owned by Mirant. It is a modest tax, only expected to raise $7.5 to $15 million a year from Mirant. However, in this age of deficits and government spending cuts, this is a welcome piece of new revenue for the county to use to support clean energy and energy efficiency programs.
Though this is progressive Montgomery County, the vote on this bill was not easy. I was proud to come out in support of the bill and to lobby for it, but unfortunately, on the day of the hearings, Americans for Prosperity, a group funded by one of the biggest oil barons in the nation, as well as Exxon and others, showed up. And let me put this simply - they were not in a mood to discuss the pros and cons of the bill. They came to disrupt, to shout, and to scare our elected leaders into submission. I had come to politely give my support for the Carbon Tax bill and was shocked to find myself in the midst of a tea party mob of 100 people or so. The good guys only numbered a handful, among them Keith and the CCAN crew, Amanda from Clean Currents, and Fred Teal, super star Green Neighborhood leader for Clean Currents.
I almost lost my temper when they started cat-calling and disrupting the testimony of my good friend and climate hero, Mike Tidwell, Director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. Luckily, Mike kept his cool as he explained how Mirant has repeatedly violated environmental rules, fights new environmental legislation, and is contributing significantly to climate change. I was never more proud.
Then, Council Members George Leventhal and Roger Berliner spoke, and they demonstrated the exact right way to handle these flat-earther tea party types. They didn't back down, apologize, or go quietly behind closed doors to express their views. Instead, they took the Mirant company official who testified out to the proverbial woodshed. They got Mirant to admit that climate change is real, is caused by man, and must be addressed (unlike the Mirant supporters and various morons in the audience who were shouting that climate change is a hoax). They got Mirant to admit that the energy that the coal plant produces doesn't even serve Montgomery County (we just get the pollution). Finally, Roger Berliner asked how Mirant could afford to pump $500 million into upgrades at the plant (forced to do so against their will, by the passage of the Healthy Air Act), but would shut down over a $7.5 to $15 million tax. The Mirant guy said that if the tax were added to the costs of the plant's operations, the plant would not be profitable (are you listening Wall Street?). Either he is stretching the truth or this is the most unprofitable coal plant in the history of the world. Most coal plants like this are gold mines for their owners.
If this Carbon Tax stands, it will serve as a model for other towns, cities, counties and places to fight climate change, promote clean energy, and bring in new revenue. Of course, a Federal effort would be better, but if we can't get a bill done with 59 or 60 Democrats in control of the Senate, we'll never get one. We need to do this from the ground up.
My hope is that the County will now fund its award winning Clean Energy Rewards program again, plus other worthy clean energy/energy efficiency programs. Way to go MoCo!
Thursday, May 13, 2010
It's About the Spill, Stupid
Today's blog is about as simple as it gets.
No more oil drilling off our coasts - the consequences of an accident, even just one, are too monumental.
No more oil drilling off our coasts - the consequences of an accident, even just one, are too monumental.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Off to the Races - Who are the Green Candidates?
With the end of the Maryland General Assembly Session, and the primaries just around the corner, politicians are scrambling in earnest to get their campaigns for office in high gear. We have many exciting races, from Cheryl Kagan and Roger Manno running for Senate in Montgomery County, to exciting races for state Delegate. The District of Columbia also will have a heated primary at the Mayoral and Council levels. We can expect the candidates to tout their environmental, or "green" credentials, whether they are first time candidates or running for re-election. It is the responsibility of each of us to fully understand the truth behind the green claims made by the candidates.
Many green-minded voters look at two things when deciding on a candidate - endorsements by green organizations (CCAN, Sierra Club, LCV), and, if they are an incumbent, their League of Conservation Voters (LCV) scorecard. Unfortunately, if you don't know the context of these items, they can possibly mislead you about the environmental credentials of a candidate.
Endorsements - I have had the honor of participating in the process of environmental endorsements in Maryland. I know it's a serious, tough process. There is a lot of weight given to incumbency. Basically, if an incumbent has a good record (ie. good LCV scorecard), he/she will likely get the endorsement, even if the challenger is an incredible grassroots environmental activist. It makes sense. You want to be able to reward people for voting the right way on environmental issues. However, as a voter, you don't have to do that. You can vote for the candidate that you think will be best on the environment, regardless of whether one is the incumbent or not.
Additionally, the issues that determine if someone is "good" on the environment or not are kind of subjective. In other words, unless someone is good on every single issue, and by the way - those issues did not have opposing viewpoints within the environmental community, the people who decide endorsements must weigh which issues count more than others. There are a host of environmental issues, from climate change, to clean energy, air pollution, stormwater management, water quality, toxins, land use, etc.
LCV Scorecard - The scorecard, like the endorsements is also somewhat subjective. Because I've walked the halls of Annapolis, I know that someone can have a 90% or even a 100% voting record and not be worth voting for. How is that? Because not all votes are the same. There are "easy" votes and "hard" votes. For example, the Democrats are a large majority in both the Maryland House and Senate. If you are a Democratic official, and your leadership in the House or Senate supports a bill, and it gets out of committee, it is not that hard of a vote to take in support of the bill. If you're from Montgomery County, it's even easier. In Maryland, the harder votes tend to come in committee, where bills live or die. Typically, if a bill gets out of committee, it passes the full chamber.
LCV does not score every environmental bill that comes up for a vote, either. It only scores the one that a handful of environmental groups have agreed are worthy of scoring. Again, if there is some disagreement about a bill, it usually will not get scored.
The point I'm making is that I support the environmental endorsement process, and I think the LCV scorecard is very useful. But to be an educated environmental voter, you need to look further in depth into the process. You need to figure out what were the truly hard votes and which were easy. You need to determine which candidate demonstrates leadership and not just voting the right way. It's a lot of work, but then again, the environment is worth it.
Clean Currents will be keeping track of the races in our neck of the woods - mainly Montgomery County. We will be happy to let you know which candidates truly support green energy and green jobs, and which ones don't. Stay tuned.
Many green-minded voters look at two things when deciding on a candidate - endorsements by green organizations (CCAN, Sierra Club, LCV), and, if they are an incumbent, their League of Conservation Voters (LCV) scorecard. Unfortunately, if you don't know the context of these items, they can possibly mislead you about the environmental credentials of a candidate.
Endorsements - I have had the honor of participating in the process of environmental endorsements in Maryland. I know it's a serious, tough process. There is a lot of weight given to incumbency. Basically, if an incumbent has a good record (ie. good LCV scorecard), he/she will likely get the endorsement, even if the challenger is an incredible grassroots environmental activist. It makes sense. You want to be able to reward people for voting the right way on environmental issues. However, as a voter, you don't have to do that. You can vote for the candidate that you think will be best on the environment, regardless of whether one is the incumbent or not.
Additionally, the issues that determine if someone is "good" on the environment or not are kind of subjective. In other words, unless someone is good on every single issue, and by the way - those issues did not have opposing viewpoints within the environmental community, the people who decide endorsements must weigh which issues count more than others. There are a host of environmental issues, from climate change, to clean energy, air pollution, stormwater management, water quality, toxins, land use, etc.
LCV Scorecard - The scorecard, like the endorsements is also somewhat subjective. Because I've walked the halls of Annapolis, I know that someone can have a 90% or even a 100% voting record and not be worth voting for. How is that? Because not all votes are the same. There are "easy" votes and "hard" votes. For example, the Democrats are a large majority in both the Maryland House and Senate. If you are a Democratic official, and your leadership in the House or Senate supports a bill, and it gets out of committee, it is not that hard of a vote to take in support of the bill. If you're from Montgomery County, it's even easier. In Maryland, the harder votes tend to come in committee, where bills live or die. Typically, if a bill gets out of committee, it passes the full chamber.
LCV does not score every environmental bill that comes up for a vote, either. It only scores the one that a handful of environmental groups have agreed are worthy of scoring. Again, if there is some disagreement about a bill, it usually will not get scored.
The point I'm making is that I support the environmental endorsement process, and I think the LCV scorecard is very useful. But to be an educated environmental voter, you need to look further in depth into the process. You need to figure out what were the truly hard votes and which were easy. You need to determine which candidate demonstrates leadership and not just voting the right way. It's a lot of work, but then again, the environment is worth it.
Clean Currents will be keeping track of the races in our neck of the woods - mainly Montgomery County. We will be happy to let you know which candidates truly support green energy and green jobs, and which ones don't. Stay tuned.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Don't Let County Executive Leggett Kill Clean Energy Program in MoCo
County Executive Leggett Kills Funding for Clean Energy Rewards
Action by Council Can Still Save the Program
Montgomery County has been building an impressive green infrastructure, block by green block, these past several years, but County Executive Ike Leggett's decision to kill one of the County's most successful green programs is a significant step backwards. In his recently announced budget plan, Mr. Leggett has proposed to entirely kill the Clean Energy Rewards Program. This makes no sense, and we need to get the County Council to act to reverse Mr. Leggett's mistake.
The concept of the Clean Energy Rewards program is simple. Montgomery County electricity users get, in effect, a tax credit against the County energy tax if they buy clean energy. When the Program was created, after a bill championed by Council Member George Leventhal passed the County Council, the idea was to use some funds from the County energy tax to fund the program. Clean Currents has been a certified vendor in the program since its inception. It has worked remarkably well. People, businesses, faith institutions and others have bought clean energy for the very first time. Tons of carbon, the main greenhouse gas causing climate change, have been offset. In fact, the program is one of the most cost effective ways the county has been able to reduce or offset carbon emissions. Montgomery County is the only county in the nation with a program like this. It has won national acclaim, deservedly so, for running this program.
Last year, the program cost the County $550,000. Mr. Leggett is now proposing to raise the energy tax by an additional $50 million. Some of that tax revenue should go to fund the Clean Energy Rewards Program. It is hard to understand why the County Executive did not merely raise the energy tax another half million dollars so that he could fund this incredibly effective green program. He says he had to make "hard decisions," to balance the budget. But I would suggest that being environmentally responsible is for the good times and the bad. For the good budgets and the lean ones. Opposition to progressive environmental standards often comes in the guise of "it will hurt the economy." But here in Montgomery County, our leaders must not fall for that line of thinking. They must stand up for environmental protection in all times. The issue of tackling climate change cannot wait until some future time. We must act now to start addressing it. That's what Cong. Chris Van Hollen says, it is what other progressive leaders say, and it must be what Montgomery County says.
Let's reverse this bad decision. Please send an email immediately to Council President Nancy Floreen asking her to restore funding for Clean Energy Rewards.
Her email is councilmember.floreen@montgomerycountymd.gov
If you want to email other Council Members, please go to
http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/csltmpl.asp?url=/content/council/index.asp
Action by Council Can Still Save the Program
Montgomery County has been building an impressive green infrastructure, block by green block, these past several years, but County Executive Ike Leggett's decision to kill one of the County's most successful green programs is a significant step backwards. In his recently announced budget plan, Mr. Leggett has proposed to entirely kill the Clean Energy Rewards Program. This makes no sense, and we need to get the County Council to act to reverse Mr. Leggett's mistake.
The concept of the Clean Energy Rewards program is simple. Montgomery County electricity users get, in effect, a tax credit against the County energy tax if they buy clean energy. When the Program was created, after a bill championed by Council Member George Leventhal passed the County Council, the idea was to use some funds from the County energy tax to fund the program. Clean Currents has been a certified vendor in the program since its inception. It has worked remarkably well. People, businesses, faith institutions and others have bought clean energy for the very first time. Tons of carbon, the main greenhouse gas causing climate change, have been offset. In fact, the program is one of the most cost effective ways the county has been able to reduce or offset carbon emissions. Montgomery County is the only county in the nation with a program like this. It has won national acclaim, deservedly so, for running this program.
Last year, the program cost the County $550,000. Mr. Leggett is now proposing to raise the energy tax by an additional $50 million. Some of that tax revenue should go to fund the Clean Energy Rewards Program. It is hard to understand why the County Executive did not merely raise the energy tax another half million dollars so that he could fund this incredibly effective green program. He says he had to make "hard decisions," to balance the budget. But I would suggest that being environmentally responsible is for the good times and the bad. For the good budgets and the lean ones. Opposition to progressive environmental standards often comes in the guise of "it will hurt the economy." But here in Montgomery County, our leaders must not fall for that line of thinking. They must stand up for environmental protection in all times. The issue of tackling climate change cannot wait until some future time. We must act now to start addressing it. That's what Cong. Chris Van Hollen says, it is what other progressive leaders say, and it must be what Montgomery County says.
Let's reverse this bad decision. Please send an email immediately to Council President Nancy Floreen asking her to restore funding for Clean Energy Rewards.
Her email is councilmember.floreen@montgomerycountymd.gov
If you want to email other Council Members, please go to
http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/csltmpl.asp?url=/content/council/index.asp
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Back to the States
In the waning days of the Bush-Cheney administration, environmental groups and concerned businesses started a dramatic shift in strategy in the effort to combat radical climate change. They shifted from a state level strategy back to a Capitol Hill strategy. With the election of Barak Obama and a super majority Democratic Congress, this choice made even more sense. For a brief moment, it seemed like the United States would adopt national legislation to promote clean energy and reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. Unfortunately, that moment may have passed. Seems like it's time to go back to the states.
The benefits of doing something at the Federal level vs. the state level are clear. We can cause a much more significant change in our fossil fuel use at the national level. The problem is that we seem to live in an era (and hopefully it's temporary) when our political system is simply broken, and unable to solve the large national questions of the day. Maybe the problem is the Senate, where tiny Wyoming, with about 1.5% of the population of California has the same number of Senators. Maybe the problem is the money in politics, the fundraising and the favors. Who knows? Bottom line - I don't expect any significant bill to come from Capitol Hill.
So, we're back to working the states. The record there is pretty impressive. Thanks to a lot of hard work in Maryland, we've got some pretty progressive environmental/clean energy laws here. Maryland is part of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), committing to a ten percent reduction in greenhouse gases from power plants along with nine other states in the northeast. RGGI is on the right track and with some improvement can make some real significant cuts in greenhouse gases. California and other western states are adopting a similar plan.
The way to make these kind of efforts even more impactful is to deal with the issue of "leakage," or out-of-state emissions related to energy use in state. This can be done. California, for example, can require a large portion of power delivered to it to come from clean sources, or have a cap on greenhouse gases associated with it. That way, emissions from power plants in Nevada, Idaho, or other western states would be reduced. If we did this in the Mid Atlantic, we could reduce emissions from plants in states such as Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and elsewhere. In other words, an action in a few states could have an impact in many. We don't need to pass progressive environmental and clean energy laws in every state, just in the states where most of the people live and most of the jobs are. Luckily, those states are generally the most open to progressive legislation to combat climate change or to promote clean energy.
I hope I'm wrong about Capitol Hill. But if I'm not, let's get back to work in the states.
The benefits of doing something at the Federal level vs. the state level are clear. We can cause a much more significant change in our fossil fuel use at the national level. The problem is that we seem to live in an era (and hopefully it's temporary) when our political system is simply broken, and unable to solve the large national questions of the day. Maybe the problem is the Senate, where tiny Wyoming, with about 1.5% of the population of California has the same number of Senators. Maybe the problem is the money in politics, the fundraising and the favors. Who knows? Bottom line - I don't expect any significant bill to come from Capitol Hill.
So, we're back to working the states. The record there is pretty impressive. Thanks to a lot of hard work in Maryland, we've got some pretty progressive environmental/clean energy laws here. Maryland is part of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), committing to a ten percent reduction in greenhouse gases from power plants along with nine other states in the northeast. RGGI is on the right track and with some improvement can make some real significant cuts in greenhouse gases. California and other western states are adopting a similar plan.
The way to make these kind of efforts even more impactful is to deal with the issue of "leakage," or out-of-state emissions related to energy use in state. This can be done. California, for example, can require a large portion of power delivered to it to come from clean sources, or have a cap on greenhouse gases associated with it. That way, emissions from power plants in Nevada, Idaho, or other western states would be reduced. If we did this in the Mid Atlantic, we could reduce emissions from plants in states such as Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and elsewhere. In other words, an action in a few states could have an impact in many. We don't need to pass progressive environmental and clean energy laws in every state, just in the states where most of the people live and most of the jobs are. Luckily, those states are generally the most open to progressive legislation to combat climate change or to promote clean energy.
I hope I'm wrong about Capitol Hill. But if I'm not, let's get back to work in the states.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
The Power of (Green) Community
While the snow fell last Saturday and most people were in their warm homes, or out shoveling, something really special and unique was happening in Rockville. Clean Currents, led by our incredible staff (way to go Amanda and Kristi!) was hosting our very first Green Neighborhood Challenge Leadership training. More than 35 people braved the elements to attend. As far as I know, this is the first time a for- profit company hosted and led an environmental activist training event. The fact that this event took place, that people were extremely excited and interested, speaks volumes about the kind of company Clean Currents is. It is hard to imagine any other company, green or otherwise, hosting a meeting like this in our area.
Cultivating relationships with activists is part of our mission, and reflects on the unique position of Clean Currents. As a company, we understand that confronting climate change is going to take an "all of the above" approach. Voluntary actions are important, but only as far as they change people's conscience, only as far as they change the values of our society. That's where activism comes in. Once we change people's conscience we need to change our nation's laws. This will happen by people from all over the political spectrum getting active and getting things done. It's a two step process. Clean Currents offers a great, green product that is available to the general public, unlike say a Prius or other green items that come with a relatively hefty price tag. Our wind power for homes actually may save people money, yet it also opens a window to a new world for them. They get on our eNewsletter list and learn about all the other ways they can positively effect the world through voluntary actions or legislation.
That's what this past week's leadership training was about- giving citizens the tools they need to educate their neighbors about the fight to end climate change. It's not enough to sign up for wind power at home. We need to do more. Hopefully these leaders will go out and spread that message. And hopefully other companies will follow Clean Currents example and recognize that being a good green corporate citizen means much more than putting a green sticker on your window and buying recycled paper for your printers. It means engaging the public, giving the public the tools they need, and giving the public a platform to work from.
keepin' it green
Cultivating relationships with activists is part of our mission, and reflects on the unique position of Clean Currents. As a company, we understand that confronting climate change is going to take an "all of the above" approach. Voluntary actions are important, but only as far as they change people's conscience, only as far as they change the values of our society. That's where activism comes in. Once we change people's conscience we need to change our nation's laws. This will happen by people from all over the political spectrum getting active and getting things done. It's a two step process. Clean Currents offers a great, green product that is available to the general public, unlike say a Prius or other green items that come with a relatively hefty price tag. Our wind power for homes actually may save people money, yet it also opens a window to a new world for them. They get on our eNewsletter list and learn about all the other ways they can positively effect the world through voluntary actions or legislation.
That's what this past week's leadership training was about- giving citizens the tools they need to educate their neighbors about the fight to end climate change. It's not enough to sign up for wind power at home. We need to do more. Hopefully these leaders will go out and spread that message. And hopefully other companies will follow Clean Currents example and recognize that being a good green corporate citizen means much more than putting a green sticker on your window and buying recycled paper for your printers. It means engaging the public, giving the public the tools they need, and giving the public a platform to work from.
keepin' it green
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Promoting Clean Energy in Good Times and Bad - Legislative Preview
This will be the year we see which of our elected leaders steps up to the challenge of promoting clean energy even in tough economic times. The Maryland and Virginia General Assembly sessions are just getting started with all the talk about budget deficits, while local counties are also grappling with massive budget holes. This means that some leaders will be tempted to gut, kill or raid funding from programs designed to promote clean energy. It's already starting to happen.
Montgomery County has a unique and extremely successful program designed to promote clean energy and effectively reduce carbon emissions. It's called "Clean Energy Rewards." Clean Currents was a proud certified vendor in the program. I say "was" because County Executive Ike Leggett is considering a budget that would completely cut funding for the program for the next fiscal year (starting July 1, 2010). Yup, not a funding reduction but a complete zeroing out of the budget. This, despite the fact that the County has won national kudos for the program and has rightfully pointed out how effective it is at reducing carbon emissions. Why cut such a successful program? Tight budget, of course. The message this action would send is clear - Montgomery County only fights climate change and promotes clean energy when times are good.
In Annapolis, the picture may be brighter. There, the Governor is crafting an energy package that will continue and build upon the state's support for solar energy. It will also promote off-shore wind, and electric cars. Let's hope our state legislators have the foresight to pass the Governor's energy package, even in these tight budget times. The solar energy industry association is asking for some additional items that may not be included in the Governor's energy package, yet they are vital to the industry's growth. These include up-front payments for Solar Credits (SRECs), which would dramatically reduce the initial payment needed to install a system. Small wind installers are looking for a better framework for their industry. Maybe a legislative champion will step up to fight for this small, but growing clean energy sector. It would really help farmers on the Eastern Shore. Environmental advocates are pushing for a clean energy first bill, which would instruct the Public Service Commission to favor renewable energy for new generation in the state. Sounds like a good idea, but I'll need to see the details. Finally, Delegate Herman Taylor is crafting a bill that would help make electricity choice more widespread in Maryland. Definitely a good idea.
I'll keep tabs on Annapolis and will let you know when something worthwhile needs your attention. In the meantime, we need to start contacting Montgomery County Executive Ike Leggett, to let him know that Clean Energy Rewards should be fully funded. He can bring the program back to life by putting the funding back in the County budget before he presents it March 15. The climate cannot wait. This is the time to act. Contact the County Executive at ocemail@montgomerycountymd.gov. Be sure to CC me at gary@cleancurrents.com when you send an email. Stay tuned for more in the next blog.
Montgomery County has a unique and extremely successful program designed to promote clean energy and effectively reduce carbon emissions. It's called "Clean Energy Rewards." Clean Currents was a proud certified vendor in the program. I say "was" because County Executive Ike Leggett is considering a budget that would completely cut funding for the program for the next fiscal year (starting July 1, 2010). Yup, not a funding reduction but a complete zeroing out of the budget. This, despite the fact that the County has won national kudos for the program and has rightfully pointed out how effective it is at reducing carbon emissions. Why cut such a successful program? Tight budget, of course. The message this action would send is clear - Montgomery County only fights climate change and promotes clean energy when times are good.
In Annapolis, the picture may be brighter. There, the Governor is crafting an energy package that will continue and build upon the state's support for solar energy. It will also promote off-shore wind, and electric cars. Let's hope our state legislators have the foresight to pass the Governor's energy package, even in these tight budget times. The solar energy industry association is asking for some additional items that may not be included in the Governor's energy package, yet they are vital to the industry's growth. These include up-front payments for Solar Credits (SRECs), which would dramatically reduce the initial payment needed to install a system. Small wind installers are looking for a better framework for their industry. Maybe a legislative champion will step up to fight for this small, but growing clean energy sector. It would really help farmers on the Eastern Shore. Environmental advocates are pushing for a clean energy first bill, which would instruct the Public Service Commission to favor renewable energy for new generation in the state. Sounds like a good idea, but I'll need to see the details. Finally, Delegate Herman Taylor is crafting a bill that would help make electricity choice more widespread in Maryland. Definitely a good idea.
I'll keep tabs on Annapolis and will let you know when something worthwhile needs your attention. In the meantime, we need to start contacting Montgomery County Executive Ike Leggett, to let him know that Clean Energy Rewards should be fully funded. He can bring the program back to life by putting the funding back in the County budget before he presents it March 15. The climate cannot wait. This is the time to act. Contact the County Executive at ocemail@montgomerycountymd.gov. Be sure to CC me at gary@cleancurrents.com when you send an email. Stay tuned for more in the next blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)